Bias and Conflict: A Case for Logical Intuitions.

نویسنده

  • Wim De Neys
چکیده

Human reasoning has been characterized as often biased, heuristic, and illogical. In this article, I consider recent findings establishing that, despite the widespread bias and logical errors, people at least implicitly detect that their heuristic response conflicts with traditional normative considerations. I propose that this conflict sensitivity calls for the postulation of logical and probabilistic knowledge that is intuitive and that is activated automatically when people engage in a reasoning task. I sketch the basic characteristics of these intuitions and point to implications for ongoing debates in the field.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Feeling we're biased: autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict.

Human reasoning is often biased by intuitive beliefs. A key question is whether the bias results from a failure to detect that the intuitions conflict with logical considerations or from a failure to discard these tempting intuitions. The present study addressed this unresolved debate by focusing on conflict-related autonomic nervous system modulation during biased reasoning. Participants' skin...

متن کامل

What Makes a Good Reasoner?: Brain Potentials and Heuristic Bias Susceptibility

Human reasoning is often biased by intuitive heuristics. A key question is why some people are less susceptible to this bias than others. It is debated whether the bias results from a failure to monitor one’s intuitive conclusions for conflict with logical considerations or from a failure to inhibit the tempting intuitions. This results in different views on the role of individual differences i...

متن کامل

Heuristic Bias, Conflict, and Rationality in Decision-Making

B.M. Glatzeder et al. (eds.), Towards a Theory of Thinking, On Thinking, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-03129-8_2, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010 Abstract Half a century of reasoning and decision-making research has shown that human thinking is often biased. People seem to over-rely on intuitions and gut feelings instead of on more demanding, deliberative reasoning when making decisions. The o...

متن کامل

Biased but in Doubt: Conflict and Decision Confidence

Human reasoning is often biased by intuitive heuristics. A central question is whether the bias results from a failure to detect that the intuitions conflict with traditional normative considerations or from a failure to discard the tempting intuitions. The present study addressed this unresolved debate by using people's decision confidence as a nonverbal index of conflict detection. Participan...

متن کامل

People Like Logical Truth: Testing the Intuitive Detection of Logical Value in Basic Propositions

Recent studies on logical reasoning have suggested that people are intuitively aware of the logical validity of syllogisms or that they intuitively detect conflict between heuristic responses and logical norms via slight changes in their feelings. According to logical intuition studies, logically valid or heuristic logic no-conflict reasoning is fluently processed and induces positive feelings ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science

دوره 7 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012